Closed leifwalsh closed 8 years ago
https://github.com/CBaquero/delta-enabled-crdts/blob/5f9565619d8c4b265863d39cadf4c07be921f485/delta-crdts.cc#L321 I think this should be && instead of ||? The way it is now, if one iterator dies then we stop examining the other one, so we'd lose data if there were new items later on in o, or we'd neglect to delete data if there was evidence that later items in this had been deleted.
&&
||
o
this
no I can't do boolean algebra, ignore me. ugh.
https://github.com/CBaquero/delta-enabled-crdts/blob/5f9565619d8c4b265863d39cadf4c07be921f485/delta-crdts.cc#L321 I think this should be
&&
instead of||
? The way it is now, if one iterator dies then we stop examining the other one, so we'd lose data if there were new items later on ino
, or we'd neglect to delete data if there was evidence that later items inthis
had been deleted.