search

CC-Archived / promise-as3

Promises/A+ compliant implementation in ActionScript 3.0
168 stars 55 forks source link

Consider moving `nextTick` into `promise` package #17

Closed darscan closed 11 years ago

darscan commented 11 years ago

I realize that the util package makes sense when viewed from a "CodeCatalyst" organization perspective, but as a user of this 3rd-party lib it looks a little out of place.

ThomasBurleson commented 11 years ago

The nextTick function does seem orphaned. In my mind, however, we have only two solutions: place such methods in a generic utils class or move it into the promise package and also replicate it in the FlexExtensions utils lib.

While it makes sense to move (instead of replicate) nextTick() to the FlexExtensions library, then the Promise-AS3 lib would have an unwanted dependency.

I also think a utils package is a great place to put global and static functions... as both do not necessitate new construction. So, IMHO, the utils package is a reasonable compromise that achieves multiple purposes.

darscan commented 11 years ago

OK cool, sounds reasonable.