Closed htobon closed 8 years ago
We got the following messages from Magdalena and Vanessa:
Magdalena:
Hi Hector,
I think that "non-peer reviewed articles" might not be in journals but e.g. in magazins like Scientific American or something even less scientific? At least that's how I understand it, but I'm open for a discussion if anyone disagrees :).
I'll try to have a look at everything today.
Vanessa:
Yes exactly – it could include non-peer reviewed journals and pieces published in magazines or other quarterlies.
Anyhow, Magdalena will going to work on a description and possible examples for each sub-category (on last week of August).
The idea will be to include these description in P&R when the user select some sub-category.
@sebas932 @hernandcb :arrow_right: For your information
Hi @sebas932, @hernandcb @Jorgesolis1989 and @carlosmartinezmoreno
We received an answerd from Magdalena 2 days ago with the following action points:
In addition, we need to make some changes in the database as, ideally, we want to show some further explanation about each category. Thus, the action points would be:
Ir was decided that the sub-category "Information outputs" is not needed anymore. Thus, we are in process to re-categorize those deliverables that are related to it.
Tasks already done and waiting for Paola to begin with the new categorization.
Done.
Wiebke's feedback: we need to confirm the consistency in naming types: e.g. peer reviewed journal articles versus non-peer reviewed articles.
I sent an email to Magdalena. She will revise all the categories as well.
Will be updating what is happening here.