Closed haruosuz closed 3 years ago
Dear @haruosuz,
Thank you for reporting this! Apparently, these sequences slipped through our filtering steps. We will investigate this issue and update the code to avoid such cases in the future.
Hi @haruosuz, we are currently testing and reviewing the new release before rolling out the updated database. In the upcoming release (still to be published in 2020), we fixed the duplicated entries.
Thanks again for reporting the issue!
Hey @haruosuz ! Happy to announce that we've rolled out the latest update of PLSDB! This release should also resolve the duplicated entries. We would be happy to receive your feedback. Thanks!
In PLSDB (version 2020_06_29), of the 23227 records, there were 44 duplicate plasmids (i.e., one from INSDC and one from RefSeq; e.g., CP026582.3 and NZ_CP026582.2). I was wondering whether there is any reason to retain both of the duplicate plasmids?
Rtable.plsdb.txt