[FEATURE] more vulcan disablers

[larryngton]

LiquidBounce Branch

Nextgen

Describe your feature request.

• autoclicker disabler (since vulcan's autoclicker checks rely on swing packets, canceling them disables all the checks while still allowing you to attack)
• sprint disabler (literally cancel sprint packets / or you can make the character not sprint at all but set his speed to 5.61bps)
• scaffold limit disabler (send a sneak packet every 0.5sec)

Additional context

please add toggles for these disablers instead of disabler modes

[EclipsesDev]

the scaffold thing is already made into script by someone on forum, i think..

[1zun4]

well we called these things bypasses back then :skull: - and all of this can already be done.

No Sprint Packets? - AntiHunger No Swing Packets? - NoSwing Scaffold Limit Disabler? - Kinda, Eagle would, but I know that you probably mean like silent sneaking.

[larryngton]

well we called these things bypasses back then 💀 - and all of this can already be done.

No Sprint Packets? - AntiHunger No Swing Packets? - NoSwing Scaffold Limit Disabler? - Kinda, Eagle would, but I know that you probably mean like silent sneaking.

scaffold is correct, I didn't know antihunger existed on nextgen, and killaura's noswing does not even work, I've tried it

and the noswing module also disables the client side animation :(

[1zun4]

there are options on the noswing module and yes the "swing" option is just visual on the killaura

[larryngton]

turns out

well we called these things bypasses back then 💀 - and all of this can already be done.

No Sprint Packets? - AntiHunger No Swing Packets? - NoSwing Scaffold Limit Disabler? - Kinda, Eagle would, but I know that you probably mean like silent sneaking.

turns out antihunger launches you in the air when you start attacking with killaura, nice *its superknockback my bad

and breaking blocks with noswing flags for nuker badpackets, so you still need to implement these "bypasses" or fix them

[larryngton]

well we called these things bypasses back then 💀 - and all of this can already be done.

No Sprint Packets? - AntiHunger No Swing Packets? - NoSwing Scaffold Limit Disabler? - Kinda, Eagle would, but I know that you probably mean like silent sneaking.

i mentioned in the issue that these are disablers and not bypasses because a vulcan autoclicker check bypass, for example, needs you to use specific cps in your config. but the disabler allows you to even use 60-60cps without flags. bypasses dont completely disable parts of anticheats

[1zun4]

"bypasses dont completely disable parts of anticheats", yes, that's what we call a bypass. It bypasses a certain check.

[SmugNugg]

ey greedy bastars, be happy for a disabler

[1zun4]

I was just saying that it's not a disabler and all can be done already.

For example, 7 years ago, such things as "Disablers" never existed. It's just a weird ass way to remarketing bypasses as "disablers", you are not disabling anything you are BYPASSING it. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DfpO5ELXwM8

This bypass, which you would nowadays call Disabler, was working because we cancelled sprint packets. Oh wow! What a new technolgy! Certainly this should have been called a disabler, because it did "disable" ... one check.

[larryngton]

I was just saying that it's not a disabler and all can be done already.

For example, 7 years ago, such things as "Disablers" never existed. It's just a weird ass way to remarketing bypasses as "disablers", you are not disabling anything you are BYPASSING it. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DfpO5ELXwM8

This bypass, which you would nowadays call Disabler, was working because we cancelled sprint packets. Oh wow! What a new technolgy! Certainly this should have been called a disabler, because it did "disable" ... one check.

vulcan riptide disabler is a bypass? then why dont you make a "bypass" module, delete the disabler module and put it in there?