Closed davedavemckay closed 4 years ago
Just a few questions before I decide whether to merge this:
- is there a particular reason for using this and not simply
EFGAsymmetry
? It's the same quantity except I think for the sign.
eta is the conventional quantity
- why was the docstring to Vzz modified? Is that a mistake? Or is the diff acting up and it actually wasn't like that?
There should be no change to Vzz - see any changes as typos.
- is the docstring to EFGEta actually done properly? It looks like the definition is missing, I only see
eta =
and then nothing.
I forgot to go back and fill this in. It should read: "eta = (Vxx-Vyy)/Vzz"
I have fixed the "eta =" docstring line and added EFGQuadrupolarProduct
Ok, so now it's just the EFGQuadrupolarProduct then. Merging!
Just a few questions before I decide whether to merge this:
EFGAsymmetry
? It's the same quantity except I think for the sign.EFGEta
actually done properly? It looks like the definition is missing, I only seeeta =
and then nothing.