Closed glpoulter closed 9 months ago
Ed said in email (9/12/21):
Yeah, I think we can probably lose other projects potentially.
Publications we definitely need and it'd be good to have solvers. I'd like to have the whole, 'numerical benchmarks' thing with all the instances of people doing the test case with references to the paper(s) that data came from and the solver used (and maybe a source for their data) - a bit like test case 1 (http://www.ccp-wsi.ac.uk/data_repository/test_cases/test_case_001) but better. I realise this is a bit more difficult than what we currently have but perhaps a halfway house is achievable?
For first release will leave publications in the "Relevant References" section of the test case as it is at the moment (rather than adding it and referencing it as a resource type)
Although we have related test cases in the schema and on the admin page, it would appear I forgot to add it into the frontend - so you can currently add a related test case but it won't actually show on the page...
Which of the following metadata do we want/need for test cases in the catalogue?
• Other projects related to this test case (in addition to the project which the test case was part of) • Solvers related to this test case • Other test cases related to this test case • Publications related to this test case
I’m guessing all? Or maybe all apart from projects related to this test case?