Closed ehsteve closed 1 year ago
Base: 95.89% // Head: 95.89% // No change to project coverage :thumbsup:
Coverage data is based on head (
27dbb28
) compared to base (99321ed
). Patch has no changes to coverable lines.
:umbrella: View full report at Codecov.
:loudspeaker: Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.
I do agree with I don't understand the documentation. They mention github_type
and github_count
as "options" but not sure how to toggle them and, in any case, they don't seem to be what you want. Should I get rid of it then?
Can we add back the code we had before to display the Github stars? I pulled it out from an old commit and pasted it below
<iframe src="https://ghbtns.com/github-btn.html?user=ddasilva&repo=ccsdspy&type=star&count=true&size=large" frameborder="0" scrolling="0" width="160px" height="30px"></iframe>
Done. Also added a link out to CCSDS. Not sure if you want it but seemed nice to me to provide for users.
Done. Also added a link out to CCSDS. Not sure if you want it but seemed nice to me to provide for users.
Github stars look good! Linking out to CCSDS is welcome
Production site has been rebuilt: https://ccsdspy.readthedocs.io/en/latest/
I kind of think having the stars count like we used to have makes more sense than the watch count. It gives a similar endorsement metric like the "used by" section. I personally never watch repositories so maybe I'm biased. What do you think?