Open SamuelBrand1 opened 2 weeks ago
Yes I think fixing the seed here and generally makes a lot of sense
It would be super convenient if we could add a line or two of code that gets propagated to every testitem
. I don't think thats currently possible so I've flagged it here https://github.com/julia-vscode/TestItemRunner.jl/issues/75
Good point. Is there really no ability to run across test setup code?
Looks like this is coming https://github.com/julia-vscode/TestItemRunner.jl/pull/57
AFAIK its blocked by integration into VS-code test suite.
I note that #314 got bumped from the merge queue due to an occasional stochastic failure... despite this PR not being concerned with
EpiAware
.what is the best way to build resilience here without causing false pass checks? Maybe fixing the rand seed?