Open jorg3lopez opened 8 months ago
Need to confirm that the MN ORU sample file we're using is realistic
This is what the warning looks like: {"@timestamp":"2024-06-14T17:34:20.69877Z","level":"WARN","message":"Resource is missing required element: value","thread_name":"JettyServerThreadPool-18"}
I translated the new CA file in RS and checked TI for warnings. There were no warnings with the new up-to-date CA file. See branch story/940/sample-files for sample files.
Attempted to use CWE to trigger warnings in the up-to-date CA file. They did not trigger warnings.
Need to test with realistic AL and LA ORU messages.
Test with current OML and ORU test messages
Bug
Warning Messages
FHIR messages coming from RS trigger warning messages that notify the user that a required value field is missing. The warnings come out of a few missing values from some, not all,
Organization
resources and thePractitioner
resource. The warnings seem to be related to theuniversal-id-unknown-type
anduniversal-id-type
fields.Impact
FHIR message might not have the proper structure.
To Reproduce
Expected Behavior
There is still more research to be done in order to find out if the message is missing a required field from the initial HL7 translation, or if the translation to FHIR is adding additional resources without their value field.
Screenshots
Organization is missing the value field for the url of
universal-id-unknown-type
anduniversal-id-type
Practitioner
is missing the value fields for the url ofuniversal-id-unknown-type
anduniversal-id-type
Logs