Closed cbernalz closed 2 months ago
Before official review, @dylanhmorris and / or @kaitejohnson, how can we make a test for the auxiliary site functions or are we fine not having one for those?
I think it would be good to have a test that shows that variance in the deviations in the auxiliary site are the same as the variance in the spatially correlated sites (so related to this week's discussion and https://github.com/cdcent/cfa-spatial-ww-internal/issues/4)
Before official review, @dylanhmorris and / or @kaitejohnson, how can we make a test for the auxiliary site functions or are we fine not having one for those?
I think it would be good to have a test that shows that variance in the deviations in the auxiliary site are the same as the variance in the spatially correlated sites (so related to this week's discussion and cdcent/cfa-spatial-ww-internal#4)
NVM forgot we were implementing with the additional parameter of a scaling factor
Tests look good. Main remaining questions are about the
Rmd
files, as I do think we should avoid therstan
additional dependency if possible. @cbernalz @kaitejohnson
That sounds good. I think we should just replace with that, I didn't realize that function existed.
Pending CI passes, this looks good to me
I thought we were going to replace rstan
with cmdstanr
before landing this?
Pending CI passes, this looks good to me
I thought we were going to replace
rstan
withcmdstanr
before landing this?
@dylanhmorris I thought I replaced all of them. Can you reference where this is still the case?
Before official review, @dylanhmorris and / or @kaitejohnson, how can we make a test for the auxiliary site functions or are we fine not having one for those?