Open ashleygould opened 4 years ago
There are 4 hosts with fully qualified service name 'uc3-mrt-store-prd':
There are two operational issues involving these hosts:
issue: all four are in the same AWS AvailabiliyZone us-west-2c consequence:
issue: these four hosts actually provide 2 separate subservices: store-ingest, store-access consequence:
See full problem description and analysis in Pivotal Tracker: https://www.pivotaltracker.com/story/show/174605565
I read your pivotal ticket, and I like the idea of differentiating the service names. I wonder if it would make sense to rename all 4 servers in the migration. What about something like this:
There are 4 hosts with fully qualified service name 'uc3-mrt-store-prd':
There are two operational issues involving these hosts:
issue: all four are in the same AWS AvailabiliyZone us-west-2c consequence:
issue: these four hosts actually provide 2 separate subservices: store-ingest, store-access consequence:
See full problem description and analysis in Pivotal Tracker: https://www.pivotaltracker.com/story/show/174605565