Open techgique opened 4 years ago
I believe it's because those image files are missing, which reflects them missing from the original microfilm instance. So, I think it's okay?
<dmdSec ID="pageModsBib2">
<mdWrap LABEL="Page metadata" MDTYPE="MODS">
<xmlData>
<mods:mods>
<mods:part>
<mods:extent unit="pages">
<mods:start>2</mods:start>
</mods:extent>
</mods:part>
<mods:note displayLabel="University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE" type="agencyResponsibleForReproduction">nbu</mods:note>
<mods:note type="noteAboutReproduction">Not digitized, published</mods:note>
</mods:mods>
</xmlData>
</mdWrap>
</dmdSec>
for
INFO:core.batch_loader:No ocr filename for issue: Danskeren. [1915-09-01 00:00:00] page: Danskeren. (Neenah, Wis.) 1892-1920, September 01, 1915, Image 2
I skimmed the output of the most recent ingests for greatauk, fourtusker, and haydenstopdog and saw these messages. Just curious if there is anything missing / wrong with our batches.
View this text file to see the messages: newspapers-no-ocr.txt