Upload documents and implement universal viewer

[jduss4]

All document jpgs (that I know about) are ready to go and documents.csv should be up to date with their information.

What size of document should be uploaded? If full size, then is there server space that can accommodate about 110GB?

Upload and move any manifest / IIIF related tasks that need to be run into rake tasks, where possible.

Implement Universal Viewer for explore > units > unit > document tab and documents > browse pages

[wnmartin]

Jessica, Hello. The IIIF server certainly does not need access to "full tiff" images.

I believe it is planned for CDRH to have a IIIF server set up to hold the images (need not be the same server that the database and web pages sit on). That IIIF server will give access to the Document image files and the Images image files.

Robbie is working on getting a proof of concept version of the Universal Viewer to "work inside" a Rails app.

Cheers, Worthy

---

From: Jessica Dussault [notifications@github.com] Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 2:29 PM To: CDRH/sparc Cc: Subscribed Subject: [CDRH/sparc] Upload documents and implement universal viewer (#127)

All document jpgs (that I know about) are ready to go and documents.csv should be up to date with their information.

What size of document should be uploaded? If full size, then is there server space that can accommodate about 110GB?

Upload and move any manifest / IIIF related tasks that need to be run into rake tasks, where possible.

Implement Universal Viewer for explore > units > unit > document tab and documents > browse pages

— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/CDRH/sparc/issues/127, or mute the threadhttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AMtvAFFILNf-T400RTagI-t6wzvWLo7eks5sJT6bgaJpZM4OK6VX.

[jduss4]

@wnmartin Hello! Sorry for the confusion, I'm asking about the size for the JPEGs, not the TIFFs. The JPEGs are currently about 110 GB. What I'm wondering is if these could be sized down at all and still be served / tiled well, or if they should be uploaded at their current size.

[wnmartin]

Jessica, Hello. The same comment is relevant to the jpegs. Is the 110 GB the total for the image files, i.e., both the Document image files and the Images image files? For the jpeg versions of the Document image files, what resolution are they presently at?

Cheers, Worthy

---

From: Jessica Dussault [notifications@github.com] Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 3:05 PM To: CDRH/sparc Cc: wnm; Mention Subject: Re: [CDRH/sparc] Upload documents and implement universal viewer (#127)

@wnmartinhttps://github.com/wnmartin Hello! Sorry for the confusion, I'm asking about the size for the JPEGs, not the TIFFs. The JPEGs are currently about 110 GB. What I'm wondering is if these could be sized down at all and still be served / tiled well, or if they should be uploaded at their current size.

— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/CDRH/sparc/issues/127#issuecomment-312349309, or mute the threadhttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AMtvAMDAO4iggAH7lDwlUCIrT9-kb7bTks5sJUbngaJpZM4OK6VX.

[jduss4]

In terms of storage, it's definitely relevant for both, though finding 110GB of space is a lot better than 1.2 TB of space! :D That is only for the documents, not the images / photographs. I don't have the majority of the large copies for those, only "web ready" sizes that are uploaded and some tiffs.

The document JPEG resolution is 400 at the moment.

I'm guessing that we can find space on the library's production servers for the IIIF server and the images, but I'm not sure when we will be scheduling that kind of work.

[jduss4]

This is done! :)