Open adamzyg opened 11 months ago
Hi, this is a NETCONF server which implements various RFCs related to NETCONF. In these RFCs it's defined that there are no per-client notifications, and that the clients share a view of a common datastore content. What YANG models are you implementing that they are asking for something which is not according to the IETF RFCs?
I would reply pretty much the same as @jktjkt, it seems the architecture of your solution is not really compliant with YANG. However, it could be modeled properly when some identification of the specific config data (of the client) is included in the notification and then each client can filter only those referring to itself.
Thank you both, I will communicate this unreasonable requirement with the customer.
Frankly speaking, this demand may be a bit reckless. Because we have the following requirements:
I should describe this requirement clearly. Based on my current understanding of the Netconf implementation of the sysrepo+netopeer2 mechanism, I don't know how to complete this requirement. So I would like to ask the author for any suggestions.