codecov-commenter
commented
8 months ago Codecov Report
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Comparison is base (
7a6f0e3) 36.55% compared to head (f05a11b) 38.09%. Report is 19 commits behind head on unstable.
:exclamation: Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.
Additional details and impacted files
```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## unstable #471 +/- ## ============================================ + Coverage 36.55% 38.09% +1.54% ============================================ Files 182 185 +3 Lines 8112 8355 +243 ============================================ + Hits 2965 3183 +218 - Misses 5147 5172 +25 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/CFD-GO/TCLB/pull/471/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=CFD-GO) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [d2q9](https://app.codecov.io/gh/CFD-GO/TCLB/pull/471/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=CFD-GO) | `26.64% <ø> (ø)` | | | [d2q9_bc](https://app.codecov.io/gh/CFD-GO/TCLB/pull/471/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=CFD-GO) | `23.41% <ø> (ø)` | | | [d2q9_kuper](https://app.codecov.io/gh/CFD-GO/TCLB/pull/471/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=CFD-GO) | `24.19% <ø> (ø)` | | | [d3q27_PSM_NEBB](https://app.codecov.io/gh/CFD-GO/TCLB/pull/471/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=CFD-GO) | `31.77% <ø> (ø)` | | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=CFD-GO#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
this initial fix at least allows the d2q9 phase field model to be run with normal cases. There is a chance that very complex geometry may cause edge conditions (e.g. where a solid node has a normal direction that points to another solid) that may require the introduction of a new field in the future.
Note that use of nan makes failcheck require to be applied with a focus area.