CFD-GO / TCLB

TCLB - Templated MPI+CUDA/CPU Lattice Boltzmann code
https://tclb.io
GNU General Public License v3.0
184 stars 72 forks source link

Found on bunya make fails (unless nlopt disabled) due to mpi.rank #487

Closed TravisMitchell closed 11 months ago

TravisMitchell commented 11 months ago

I think this was just an outdated reference with mpi.rank - switched to mpi_rank as per other handlers and compile goes ahead.

codecov-commenter commented 11 months ago

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:

Comparison is base (93bf342) 36.69% compared to head (948cd34) 36.69%.

:exclamation: Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.

Additional details and impacted files ```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## develop #487 +/- ## ======================================== Coverage 36.69% 36.69% ======================================== Files 183 183 Lines 8380 8380 ======================================== Hits 3075 3075 Misses 5305 5305 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/CFD-GO/TCLB/pull/487/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=CFD-GO) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [d3q27_PSM_NEBB](https://app.codecov.io/gh/CFD-GO/TCLB/pull/487/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=CFD-GO) | `32.16% <ø> (ø)` | | | [d3q27_pf_velocity](https://app.codecov.io/gh/CFD-GO/TCLB/pull/487/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=CFD-GO) | `27.34% <ø> (ø)` | | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=CFD-GO#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

llaniewski commented 11 months ago

@TravisMitchell This has a bit messy commit history, so I'll "squash" it. After that you can replace your develop branch with this.