Open lrineau opened 9 years ago
@efifogel and @mhsaar, you are the 2 maintainers of the package Minkowski_sum_2
: is there a reason why a fork of AABB_tree was used? Is it possible to merge it back into the AABB_tree package or is the fork really going in different directions?
The code in the Minkowski_sum_2 package supports 2D AABB trees, while (as far as I know) CGAL has only one package that handles AABB trees and it's in 3D. Besides, and Michael knows more about this than I, the 2D version in the Minkowski_sum_2 package supports functionality the generalization of which to 3D is not supported by the 3D AABB package. In summary, the introduction of 2D AABB package and enhancing the 3D AABB packages are jobs to be done...
//) o /__ // (__ ( ( ( (/ (/-(-'(/ /
On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 11:35 AM, Simon Giraudot notifications@github.com wrote:
@efifogel https://github.com/efifogel and @mhsaar https://github.com/mhsaar, you are the 2 maintainers of the package Minkowski_sum_2: is there a reason why a fork of AABB_tree was used? Is it possible to merge it back into the AABB_tree package or is the fork really going in different directions?
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/CGAL/cgal/issues/272#issuecomment-238801303, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AGoWuMzypoR7MfiFByP56PVEj9xy2ufbks5qeY1ggaJpZM4FraNv .
Minkowski_sum_2/include/CGAL/Minkowski_sum_2/AABB_tree_with_join.h
For maintenance reasons, we should merge the two implementations!