Open vmurali opened 1 month ago
Note that I use the same names $e, d, i$ in setCapBounds
as in #75 , to correlate the code with the math.
Yes and yes!
@rmn30 https://gist.github.com/vmurali/fc50a31be8a2cdd2b82e9a1e3d164e59 seems to be the changes that you suggested. I am not sure what the problem is. It fails for 05.sealing test. The symptom I am seeing is that an untagged 64-bit 0 is interpreted as an untagged 0x100 length capability because the mantissa's MSB is 1. Is this problematic for code?
I tried to invert the polarity (all zeros means mantissa MSB is 0, all ones means mantissa MSB is 1), but that didn't work at all.
It looks like the null cap with non zero length is an issue in the code (at least for 06.sealing).
Robert's suggestion with reversed polarity is implemented now: E = if cE == 31 then 0 else cE M8 = if cE == 0 then 0 else 1
cE = if E == 0 && M8 == 1 then 31 else E
The algorithm implements Issue #75 . I also changed the encoding to represent base (B) and difference (M) rather than base (B) and top (T). This also simplified the expressions overall.