Closed wdduncan closed 3 years ago
It seems that the so#part_of was manually asserted in CIDO. It should be replaced by the BFO_0000050. Most of the terms are the subclasses of "virus protein".
'part_of' has been deprecated and replaced with the proper BFO term 'part of'
There two object properties with the label
part_of
:transitive
andreflexive
transitive
Are both needed? Having both relations may make the ontology more confusing for editors.
cc @yongqunh @linikujp @sivaramarabandi