bozyurt
commented
7 years ago No it is not. That is used to differentiate existing keywords in the original ISO document for the enhanced ones.
On 11/08/2016 04:02 PM, David Valentine wrote:
Is this the best place to fix when a list of Keywords are all caps CinergiXMLUtils.existingKeywordSet
CINERGI/ontology_cleanup#18 https://github.com/CINERGI/ontology_cleanup/issues/18
Doc ID: gov.noaa.nodc:0000030
"Coral Reef" is recognized as a Marine Feature, which is correct. But then "Reef" is recognized again as a Marine Feature and "CORAL" is recognized as an Organization.
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/CINERGI/Foundry/issues/15, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AHLczEyHviJGprU-AEOhqj3EfHTgge-Tks5q8Q2dgaJpZM4KtDhA.
I. Burak Ozyurt PhD Project Scientist University of California, San Diego 9500 Gilman Drive, M/C 0608 La Jolla, CA 92093-0608
Is this the best place to fix when a list of Keywords are all caps CinergiXMLUtils.existingKeywordSet
https://github.com/CINERGI/ontology_cleanup/issues/18
Doc ID: gov.noaa.nodc:0000030
"Coral Reef" is recognized as a Marine Feature, which is correct. But then "Reef" is recognized again as a Marine Feature and "CORAL" is recognized as an Organization.
http://132.249.238.151:8080/cinergi-annotator/annotation/index?docId=gov.noaa.nodc%3A0000030&enhancedOnly=false