Closed bauchetg closed 6 years ago
Hi Guillaume,
thanks!
For the first iteration I had in mind to keep it close to the brapi JSON input/output. If that is compatible, it certainly would be done. I note that the brapi coordinator is going through the calls. So, I will also check if the package needs further adjustments.
In general, though, I think you point at a set of features that would be useful for the analyst to have, but may be not yet of interest to be made part of the brapi standard. I have yet not made my mind up on whether to include those or not in this package. What is your view?
My pro and con are:
con: there are quite a lot of function calls already in the package. Maybe to much to add non-standard calls?
pro: just one package to think about to do all data access/filtering from a brapi db.
Best,
Reinhard
Hi Reinhardt, thanks for your quick feedback. I share your pros/cons, I guess meanwhile things are being evaluated by the coordinator we can get around by doing multiple projectID queries. Thanks!
Guillaume
Hi Reinhardt! The brapi R package is great. I was looking at the ba_studies_table() function and was wondering, if you plan to expand to collect multiple studyDbId at once? Thanks for your feedback
Guillaume