Closed quintuschen closed 5 years ago
Looks good!
Just a thought, would that be better to split to 2 flows for seeker and job poster? To simplify things a bit;
CITANZ internal follow flow can be opaque from the eyes of the two parties above;
When I included CITA in the graph, I thought job posters and job seekers might be interested in how CITA is involved in this. Since job posters need to notify us of the jobs' status, and job seekers will expect the follow-up procedure from us too, CITA will be visible in both of the flows anyway. However, I agree with you that two flows for each of them would be more clear, I will create another two flows for job posters and job seekers.
Overall it looks very good. Thanks.
I think it's OK to use one diagram to demonstrate the overall workflow. Here are some comments from my view:
Thanks for the great work again. Cheers.
Updated. Now we have two flows for each group while we keep the overall graph. Adjusted a few wordings and updated the overall workflow. I personally prefer the overall one since it covers how CITA is involved and does show clear interactions in terms of timeline.
Good work, lets get this baby merged in first.
I will put the graph into README.md once it is merged.