R package for the analysis of OK-Seq data to study DNA replication fork directionality: from count matrices, RFD calculation to inititation/termination zone calling.
GNU General Public License v3.0
11
stars
4
forks
source link
Reg: Combining replicate regions and regions flipping between presumed IZs or TZs #4
We are currently analyzing a few TrAEL-seq data-sets using OK-Seq package here. We had a few questions regarding combining the "peaky" or forking regions identified from replicates.
Do you have any particular recommendation for identifying/combining the peaks between the replicated samples?
What would be a good distance for combining nearby TZs, IZs etc?
For example:
Replicate A:
chr1 1000 1500
chr1 2000 2800
Replicate B:
chr1 1100 1400
chr1 2200 3000
Should we take the entire span like so:
chr1 1000 1500
chr1 2000 3000
or just the overlapped region between the two, like so:
chr1 1100 1400
chr1 2200 2800
While looking at the regions called by OKSeqHMM, we see multiple blips.
For example, see the 5078logy TZ and IZ tracks at the bottom of the image, while its replicate 5078logx doesn't seem to have a lot of the blips from TZ to IZ. We are a bit confused about these blips since some of these occur right around/on top of ARS regions in yeast, but have no specific pattern
Would there be a particular reason for these blips occurring? Should we consolidate these TZs interspersed with IZs in a singular region?
I can check with the PI of the project to see if they can allow sharing the trackhub for the particular segment above, but could I have your email address so that we can send these datasets confidentially? But any help in this particular issue would be really appreciated!
Hi!
We are currently analyzing a few TrAEL-seq data-sets using OK-Seq package here. We had a few questions regarding combining the "peaky" or forking regions identified from replicates.
What would be a good distance for combining nearby TZs, IZs etc?
For example:
Replicate A:
chr1 1000 1500 chr1 2000 2800
Replicate B:
chr1 1100 1400 chr1 2200 3000
Should we take the entire span like so:
chr1 1000 1500 chr1 2000 3000
or just the overlapped region between the two, like so:
chr1 1100 1400 chr1 2200 2800
For example, see the 5078logy TZ and IZ tracks at the bottom of the image, while its replicate 5078logx doesn't seem to have a lot of the blips from TZ to IZ. We are a bit confused about these blips since some of these occur right around/on top of ARS regions in yeast, but have no specific pattern
Would there be a particular reason for these blips occurring? Should we consolidate these TZs interspersed with IZs in a singular region?
I can check with the PI of the project to see if they can allow sharing the trackhub for the particular segment above, but could I have your email address so that we can send these datasets confidentially? But any help in this particular issue would be really appreciated!
Regards, Harish