Closed zongxp closed 3 years ago
This is pretty strange; typically on 7T the power limits are measured too conservatively. Did the Siemens engineer do the "RF Verify" QA? Otherwise, in case you are only seeing this when using an oil phantom (as in the image you show), perhaps it would better to use a loading phantom.
We had this problem too, while scanning a human, not phantom (VB17A, Verio). I'd say we faced it several times past month. Is there any thoughts or maybe solutions about?
Has anybody found a solution for this problem or a way to get around it? At the Magdeburg 7T we also see the problem. It is not reproducible, but there seem to be parameter sets where it happens more often than with others. It is, however, quite difficult to get a full picture as a sequence that crashes on one day does not necessarily do that half an hour later. My feeling is that multi echo/multiband is more prone to this error than single echo/multiband, but I'm not sure about it and I'm not sure whether that would make any sense.
Claus
We're past and presently having the same problem here at Auburn University on our Siemens 7T. Past releases and most current release (R016a) throw us “RF Power Limiter" error issues that stop our scans. This error occurs only with the CMRR sequence and we’ve been having the problem for about 2 years running. The RF error pops up and stops the scan 4 to 5 minutes after the scan has been running. Before the scans start, normal/acceptable SAR values are indicated. Repeat run attempts result with the same error unless we manually lower the TXref level to sub-optimal lower values.
Has anybody found a fix yet? Anybody from CMRR wish to reply?
Our 7T scanner configuration includes: software VB17A-UHF, RF Step-One transmit hardware, and NOVA head coil (32-chan Rx, 1-chan Tx). We approached Siemens with the problem and they deflected blame back to the sequence design.
My initial response was not very helpful -- these are likely all examples of the known power overestimation error of the 7T online power monitoring hardware. For RF pulses that are highly amplitude modulated, as multi-band pulses typically are, the slow response of the power monitor tends to measure an envelope of the RF pulse rather than the true shape. However, the true shape is still used for the SAR prediction calculated by the sequence (SAR % in the lower right corner of the screen). So although you might see a predicted SAR of as low as 60-70% for a given protocol (which is accurate), the online monitor will often measure something much higher and stop the scan.
There is no proper solution available (the power monitoring hardware needs to be upgraded, which it has been somewhat on the Tim4G and Step2 platforms), but there are some partial workarounds. The easiest is to enable the "phase scrambling" option, which reduces the amplitude modulation (and the peak) of the RF pulse. Another option is the time-shifted RF option (only for spin-echo sequences), or a combination of both options.
We had an abstract on this issue years ago: Proc. ISMRM 22 (2014) #1377.
Hi,
Thanks,
Xiaopeng Zong