coveralls
commented
2 months ago Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 10719743949
Details
- 1 of 1 (100.0%) changed or added relevant line in 1 file are covered.
- 1 unchanged line in 1 file lost coverage.
- Overall coverage increased (+0.04%) to 82.715%
| Files with Coverage Reduction | New Missed Lines | % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| src/meta/errors.js | 1 | 76.74% | ||
| <!-- | Total: | 1 | --> |
| Totals | |
|---|---|
| Change from base Build 10550029021: | 0.04% |
| Covered Lines: | 22333 |
| Relevant Lines: | 25583 |
sonarcloud[bot]
I was able to increase the overall code coverage of this file.
83.26% Statements 408/490 67.34% Branches 165/245 82.69% Functions 86/104 83.87% Lines 390/465
85.3% Statements 418/490 71.02% Branches 174/245 84.61% Functions 88/104 86.02% Lines 400/465
This was indicated in the npm run test locally, and on the code coverage tool, and shown to Professor Eduardo as well.
Further, I addded a console log to the flag.js file and it was shown after i triggered the code, by flagging a blog post or annoucement.