codecov[bot]
commented
2 years ago Codecov Report
Base: 96.05% // Head: 96.05% // No change to project coverage :thumbsup:
Coverage data is based on head (
499d3de) compared to base (915196a). Patch has no changes to coverable lines.
Additional details and impacted files
```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## master #113 +/- ## ======================================= Coverage 96.05% 96.05% ======================================= Files 7 7 Lines 837 837 ======================================= Hits 804 804 Misses 33 33 ``` | Flag | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | unittests | `96.05% <ø> (ø)` | | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=CMakePP#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more. Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us [how you rate us](https://about.codecov.io/nps?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=CMakePP). Have a feature suggestion? [Share it here.](https://app.codecov.io/gh/feedback/?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=CMakePP):umbrella: View full report at Codecov.
:loudspeaker: Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.
ryanmrichard
Is this pull request associated with an issue(s)? Fixes #111
Description This PR expands on the "Documenting a Function" documentation. The goal was primarily to make the distinction between the
:param:and:keyword:fields more clear. There's also a very minor change to thebasic_function.rstfile included in the documentation in order to fix the syntax highlighting.TODOs None.