codecov[bot]
commented
2 years ago Codecov Report
Base: 96.80% // Head: 96.80% // No change to project coverage :thumbsup:
Coverage data is based on head (
15d82e9) compared to base (7184b41). Patch has no changes to coverable lines.
Additional details and impacted files
```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## master #132 +/- ## ======================================= Coverage 96.80% 96.80% ======================================= Files 6 6 Lines 719 719 ======================================= Hits 696 696 Misses 23 23 ``` | Flag | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | unittests | `96.80% <ø> (ø)` | | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=CMakePP#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more. Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us [how you rate us](https://about.codecov.io/nps?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=CMakePP). Have a feature suggestion? [Share it here.](https://app.codecov.io/gh/feedback/?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=CMakePP):umbrella: View full report at Codecov.
:loudspeaker: Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.
ryanmrichard
Like the title says this adds a badge to the README with our JOSS DOI. I also told the license action to skip
docs/requirements.txtbecause apparently that file is in master despite my claim in #131...