Closed notti closed 6 years ago
See also https://github.com/CN-TU/nta-meta-analysis/blob/95e95da5b8a8a8b0854429a2cb5c365277c90931/v2_papers/2017/ashfaq_fuzziness.json#L37 https://github.com/CN-TU/nta-meta-analysis/blob/95e95da5b8a8a8b0854429a2cb5c365277c90931/v2_papers/2016/ambusaidi_building.json#L59 https://github.com/CN-TU/nta-meta-analysis/blob/c5b991a2c7bf564bf3d661791f17e5561084f7d8/v2_papers/2012/zargari_feature.json#L36 https://github.com/CN-TU/nta-meta-analysis/blob/c5b991a2c7bf564bf3d661791f17e5561084f7d8/v2_papers/2013/zhang_aneffective.json#L36 https://github.com/CN-TU/nta-meta-analysis/blob/c5b991a2c7bf564bf3d661791f17e5561084f7d8/v2_papers/2016/javaid_adeep.json#L38
vs
I agree.
Best,
F
Gesendet: Freitag, 20. April 2018 um 09:13 Uhr Von: "Gernot Vormayr" notifications@github.com An: CN-TU/nta-meta-analysis nta-meta-analysis@noreply.github.com Cc: Subscribed subscribed@noreply.github.com Betreff: [CN-TU/nta-meta-analysis] NSL-KDD (#22)
Wasn't this dataset generated in 2009? Well it is based on KDD'99 dataset - but shouldn't this be the year the used data was generated?
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.
I agree also. I guess what makes sense for this field is the when the data is from, and not when the packets are from.
https://github.com/CN-TU/nta-meta-analysis/blob/3ea20423a3a4d69cc7ccb9bad2ded1873dffc427/v2_papers/2017/bamakan_ramp.json#L31-L38
Wasn't this dataset generated in 2009? Well it is based on KDD'99 dataset - but shouldn't this be the year the used data was generated?