Closed eivinasbutkus closed 3 years ago
Interesting -- so you'd say they're basically the same
From: Eivinas Butkus @.> Sent: Friday, May 28, 2021 7:44 PM To: CNCLgithub/mot @.> Cc: Subscribed @.***> Subject: Re: [CNCLgithub/mot] receptive field test notes (#66)
actually, those differences may be non-significant (p=0.19 from my amateur calculation)..
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2FCNCLgithub%2Fmot%2Fissues%2F66%23issuecomment-850726320&data=04%7C01%7Cilker.yildirim%40yale.edu%7Cc8714e11098440e6c64708d922327e06%7Cdd8cbebb21394df8b4114e3e87abeb5c%7C0%7C0%7C637578422551349564%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=6xJ7DEgvG8bhDvPp7dr2NryEJKkggSb1RMZhdckSxZc%3D&reserved=0, or unsubscribehttps://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fnotifications%2Funsubscribe-auth%2FABCNETNYJCJIQJFSZVFDHELTQATETANCNFSM45XVAXFQ&data=04%7C01%7Cilker.yildirim%40yale.edu%7Cc8714e11098440e6c64708d922327e06%7Cdd8cbebb21394df8b4114e3e87abeb5c%7C0%7C0%7C637578422551349564%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=JxydmTCQG65tvuAEnmHBic2wUT8hGG11P%2F8lqnTCUB8%3D&reserved=0.
thanks for posting @eivinasbutkus ,
my main concern isn't that the log score is bad but that there is unwanted entropy like we saw with compose!
. look at a sensitivity for trial 10 on fixations (or any other trial) with and without receptive fields. I noticed much more spurious attention on objects that where traversing field boundaries.
I created a scene where the dot is intersected in the middle by the receptive field because I saw some difficulty in tracking in those instances:
I ran 10000 runs for just 1 time step with and without receptive fields. Found that there is a lower score with no receptive fields than with receptive fields:
So I'm wondering maybe some pixels get dropped in the receptive fields masks or something like that.