Possible name collision between 'interval' parameter from iperf.py and a scenario parameter named 'interval'?

[godelc7]

This issue is about the job iperf job which can be found in: externals_jobs/stable_jobs/transport/iperf.

This job has an interval parameter, which is used to set the interval between each generation of metrics by the underlying iperf2 command line tool. But when I use it, lets say interval=3, it rather create an openbach job that is rescheduled every 3 seconds after the beginning of the first run. This create in fact an indefinitely running job. I guess, this wasn't the intention behind this 'interval' parameter of the iperf job.

The iperf3 job has a similar parameter, which is named metrics-interval. This is on the one hand much more precise from a semantic point of view, and on the other hand to does exactly what it should, which is to call the iperf3 command line tool with the '-i --interval' parameter.

Maybe the interval parameter of the iperf2 job should be renamed to metrics-interval also?

[Steps to Reproduce the erroneous behavior] Create a python script with the following content and execute it. It will create never ending iperf2 jobs.

from scenario_builder import Scenario scenario = Scenario('A_SCENARIO_NAME') iperf_server = scenario.add_function('start_job_instance') iperf_server.configure('iperf', 'ENTITY_NAME', server_mode=True, interval=3) iperf_client = scenario.add_function( 'start_job_instance', wait_launched=[iperf_server], wait_delay=1 ) iperf_client.configure('iperf', 'ENTITY_NAME', client_mode_server_ip=) observer = ScenarioObserver() args = ['PRJ_NAME', 'run'] observer.parse(args) observer.launch_and_wait(scenario)`

[Kniyl]

You’re perfectly right, we changed the interval argument in iperf3 back in june 2020 for the exact same reason and forgot to do it with iperf2 ever since.

Will fix ASAP!

[godelc7]

Hi,

since @Kniyl committed a fix here, should I close this issue?