finalize o.points.phase~ into one object

[kulpajj]

Rename o.points.buffer~ to be the one and only o.points.phase~ upon the next release.

[ramagottfried]

cool, are you ready to do this for the class?

Ed and I were talking about renaming all the m158. to be cnmat. also, would that be problematic? I'm assuming yes.

[ramagottfried]

ok I'm just about to push points.buffer~ converted to points.phase~ to the repository.

@kulpajj question: should it actually be called phase.points? we input phase and get out the points, so maybe that makes more sense no?

[ramagottfried]

for what it's worth, the gen~ abstraction is called phase.points, which is kind of in keeping with the naming scheme:

phase~ phase.click~ phase.points~

looks better to me I think

[ramagottfried]

ok, I did that : )

[kulpajj]

sure! Then it's named as a consistent library. (I really have to start replying to all, sorry).

On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 8:27 AM, rama gottfried notifications@github.com wrote:

for what it's worth, the gen~ abstraction is called phase.points, which is kind of in keeping with the naming scheme:

phase~ phase.click~ phase.points~

looks better to me I think

— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/CNMAT/Music-and-Computing/issues/78#issuecomment-337266155, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AWhttWEb1DCs7AK4_m6w0TCx5Ra7ipaaks5stMdsgaJpZM4P668u .

[equilet]

second for phase.points~

[ramagottfried]

great, I just pushed it to the repo! 👍

[ramagottfried]

ok done, closing p.s. I also renamed everything to be cnmat. instead of m158. in preparation for eventual release.