Open edwardleardi opened 4 years ago
Current proposal is to release a new version of ORSD which no longer has nested archives. Then we can use a structure like:
content: - file_name: data/SPE9-TRIANGLE.Aspect1/test ... - file_name: data/SPE9-TRIANGLE.Aspect1/train ... - file_name: data/SPE9-TRIANGLE.Aspect2/json_test ... - file_name: data/SPE9-TRIANGLE.Aspect2/json_train ... - file_name: data/SPE9-TRIANGLE.Aspect3.compressed.h5 ... - file_name: data/SPE9-MAX.Aspect1 ... - file_name: data/SPE9-MAX.Aspect2 ... - file_name: data/SPE9-MAX.Aspect3.compressed.h5 ...
Keeping in mind, the archive level description field for the dataset will need to describe the content composition, e.g. "...contains two versions of the dataset, SPE9-TRIANGLE which... and SPE9-MAX which..."
I'd agree that an updated version without the nested archives and using subdirectory structures instead would be best
Current proposal is to release a new version of ORSD which no longer has nested archives. Then we can use a structure like:
Keeping in mind, the archive level description field for the dataset will need to describe the content composition, e.g. "...contains two versions of the dataset, SPE9-TRIANGLE which... and SPE9-MAX which..."