COGS108 / Group043_WI24

COGS108 Final Project -- Group043_WI24 Repository
0 stars 1 forks source link

Project Checkpoint Feedback #5

Open ShanEllis opened 7 months ago

ShanEllis commented 7 months ago

Project Checkpoint Feedback

Score (out of 5 pts)

Score = 5

Data Checkpoint Feedback

Quality Reasons
Data relevance P
Data description D Since you don’t have many columns in your dataset, you could include a paragraph describing what each column variable means. Also, in your later submissions, you should include more comments in your code.
Data wrangling P Overall you did a good job cleaning your data.

Comments

Proposal Regrade Feedback

Rubric

Unsatisfactory Developing Proficient Excellent
Data relevance Did not have data relevant to their question. Or the datasets don't work together because there is no way to line them up against each other. If there are multiple datasets, most of them have this trouble Data was only tangentially relevant to the question or a bad proxy for the question. If there are multiple datasets, some of them may be irrelevant or can't be easily combined. All data sources are relevant to the question. Multiple data sources for each aspect of the project. It's clear how the data supports the needs of the project.
Data description Dataset or its cleaning procedures are not described. If there are multiple datasets, most have this trouble Data was not fully described. If there are multiple datasets, some of them are not fully described Data was fully described The details of the data descriptions and perhaps some very basic EDA also make it clear how the data supports the needs of the project.
Data wrangling Did not obtain data. They did not clean/tidy the data they obtained. If there are multiple datasets, most have this trouble Data was partially cleaned or tidied. Perhaps you struggled to verify that the data was clean because they did not present it well. If there are multiple datasets, some have this trouble The data is cleaned and tidied. The data is spotless and they used tools to visualize the data cleanliness and you were convinced at first glance

Grading Rules

Scoring: Out of 5 points

Each Developing => -1 pts Each Unsatisfactory=> -2 pts until the score is 0

If students address the detailed feedback in a future checkpoint they will earn these points back

DETAILED FEEDBACK should be left in the data section AND anywhere the student addressed proposal feedback but did not do it to your satisfaction

kmogatas commented 6 months ago

We have created additional changes and included more comments within our code as suggested. Then we added a paragraph describing all of our column variables!

Thank you, Group 43