EDA Checkpoint Feedback

[ShanEllis]

EDA Checkpoint Feedback

Score (out of 5 pts)

Score = 3

EDA Checkpoint Feedback

	Quality	Reasons
EDA Relevance	P
EDA Analysis and Description	D	Too small to see and should include all code needed to generate the figures as code blocks.
EDA Figures	D	Too small to see and should include all code needed to generate the figures as code blocks.

Comments

Regrade Feedback

Proposal

	Quality	Reasons
Abstract	NA
Research question	P
Background	D	Should probably directly engage with the source of your data (Giesbrecht et al., 2022).
Hypothesis	P
Data	P
Ethics	D	"To address these, analyzing demographic data against wider population statistics and considering the socio-cultural context in interpretations will be important. " Is this something you're going to do?
Team expectations	P
Timeline	P

Data Checkpoint Feedback

	Quality	Reasons
Data relevance	P
Data description	D	You should describe your data cleaning process in text/markdown blocks next to the code blocks as you're doing it.
Data wrangling	D	Birth dates not correctly turned into datetime format (they are NaT)

Comments

• Please remove all the question text so that it's easier to read.
• Please only include the latest version of each section (rather than the past versions as well) in your jupyter notebook submissions in fututre

Rubric

	Unsatisfactory	Developing	Proficient	Excellent
EDA relevance	EDA is mostly neither relevant to the question nor helpful in figuring out how to address the question. Or the EDA does address the question, but many obviously relevant variables / analyses / figures were not included. EDA does not include explore distributions of single variables or relationships between variables or both	EDA is partly irrelevant/unhelpful. Or some obviously relevant variables / analyses / figures were not included. EDA does not include a few distributions of single variables or relationships between variables	EDA is almost all relevant / helpful in addressing the question. No obviously relevant variables / analyses / figures were not included.	Thorough EDA addressed all aspects that are relevant to the question
EDA analysis and description	Many of the analyses are poor choices (e.g., using means instead of medians for obviously skewed data), or are poorly described in the text, or do not aid understanding the data	Some of the analyses are poor choices, or are poorly described in the text, or do not aid understanding the data	All analyses are correct choices. Only one or two have minor issues in the text descriptions supporting them. Mostly they fit well with other elements of the EDA and support understanding the data	All analyses are correct choices with clear text descriptions supporting them. The figures fit well with the other elements of the EDA, producing a clear understanding of the data.
EDA figures	Many of the figures are poor plot choices (e.g., using a bar plot to represent a time series where it would be better to use a line plot) or have poor aesthetics (including colormap, data point shape/color, axis labels, titles, annotations, text legibility) or do not aid understanding the data	Some of the figures are poor plot choices or have poor aesthetics. Some figures do not aid understanding the data	All figures are correct plot choices. Only one or two have minor questionable aesthetic choices. The figures mostly fit well with the other elements of the EDA and support understanding the data	All figures are correct plot choices with beautiful aesthetics. The figures fit well with the other elements of the EDA, producing a clear understanding of the data.

Grading Rules

Scoring: Out of 5 points

Each Developing => -1 pts Each Unsatisfactory=> -2 pts until the score is 0

If students address the detailed feedback in a future checkpoint they will earn these points back

DETAILED FEEDBACK should be left in the data section AND anywhere the student addressed proposal feedback but did not do it to your satisfaction

[jkondo14]

Hi, we submitted our final report and would like a regrade on the following: Project Proposal: We updated ethics by discussing bias and privacy and updated the background, including discussing about the source.

Checkpoint #1: We added text before our data cleaning in each step to give a clearer understanding and fixed the birthday to datetime

Checkpoint #2: We added charts and more analysis and models

Thank you so much and hope you have a wonderful break!