Closed rowlesmr closed 1 year ago
I probably did not consider the dual monochromator case. Not very common at all for Bragg-Brentano, but very common for synchrotrons.
On Oct 8, 2022, at 8:32 AM, Matthew Rowles @.**@.>> wrote:
I've been adding PD_INSTR-related output to my TOPAS macros, and I'm a little stumped on how to define the instrument radius.
I've found: _pd_instr.dist_src_mono _pd_instr.dist_mono_spec _pd_instr.dist_src_spec _pd_instr.dist_spec_anal _pd_instr.dist_anal_detc _pd_instr.dist_spec_detc
In the example below, I can specify the distances src_mono, mono_spec, spec_anal, and anal_detc, but I can't see how that allows me to calculate the goniometer radius. [image]https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/14921460/194709714-1b2f3623-6035-4f11-b99c-30eb65a7907e.png
What am I missing?
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/COMCIFS/Powder_Dictionary/issues/34, or unsubscribehttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACH7E2HYSNFORNLYU4BG6YDWCFZXRANCNFSM6AAAAAARAIJAB4. You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: @.***>
How about this as a proposal?
_pd_instr.dist_vsrc_spec
_pd_instr.dist_spec_vdetc
.
you need allow both distances, as you could have a parallel or convergent beam instrument where the incident and diffracted radii are different.
Is there a reference work that could be cited in the definition where these concepts are discussed? Volume H maybe even (we don't have access yet)?
Yes.
Vol H, S2.1.4.1, Figs 2.1.3 & 2.1.4
Arnt has some good figures of various setups. He has labelled the relevant dimension as the "detector circle"; I know it as the "goniometer circle".
Arnt also describes a a couple of optics that could be added:
I think it makes sense to provide data names for the detector circle and the two virtual distances originally proposed. In the most general case it looks like these virtual distances could vary for each angle at least in Bragg-Brentano, even if most constructions hold them constant. So we could reserve the virtual distances for cases where they vary during measurement (pd_meas
loop), and provide a detector circle data name for use where the two virtual distances are identical for every measurement point.
In a Seeman-Bolin diffractometer the distances do vary to keep the focusing circle at constant curvature.
Brian
Sent from a powerful small device but with weak eyes.
On Oct 16, 2022, at 8:12 PM, James Hester @.***> wrote:
I think it makes sense to provide data names for the detector circle and the two virtual distances originally proposed. In the most general case it looks like these virtual distances could vary for each angle at least in Bragg-Brentano, even if most constructions hold them constant. So we could reserve the virtual distances for cases where they vary during measurement (pd_meas loop), and provide a detector circle data name for use where the two virtual distances are identical for every measurement point.
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/COMCIFS/Powder_Dictionary/issues/34#issuecomment-1280130498, or unsubscribehttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACH7E2GC4CYPQU6RGAVTYRLWDSRYLANCNFSM6AAAAAARAIJAB4. You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID: @.***>
I've been adding PD_INSTR-related output to my TOPAS macros, and I'm a little stumped on how to define the instrument radius.
I've found:
_pd_instr.dist_src_mono
_pd_instr.dist_mono_spec
_pd_instr.dist_src_spec
_pd_instr.dist_spec_anal
_pd_instr.dist_anal_detc
_pd_instr.dist_spec_detc
In the example below, I can specify the distances src_mono, mono_spec, spec_anal, and anal_detc, but I can't see how that allows me to calculate the goniometer radius.
What am I missing?