Open jamesrhester opened 1 year ago
Initial untested output of latest issue_to_imgcif.jl
_audit.block_id Alba_XALOC
_diffrn_source.beamline XALOC
_diffrn_source.facility Alba
loop_
_axis.id
_axis.type
_axis.equipment
_axis.depends_on
_axis.vector[1]
_axis.vector[2]
_axis.vector[3]
_axis.offset[1]
_axis.offset[2]
_axis.offset[3]
angle rotation goniometer . 1 0 0 0
0 0
source . source . 0 0 1 0
0 0
gravity . gravity . 0 1 0 0
0 0
two_theta rotation detector . 1 0 0 0
0 0
trans translation detector two_theta 0 0 -1 0
0 0
detx translation detector trans -1 0 0 211.81800
-217.32200 0
dety translation detector detx 0 1 0 0
0 0
loop_
_array_structure_list_axis.axis_id
_array_structure_list_axis.axis_set_id
_array_structure_list_axis.displacement
_array_structure_list_axis.displacement_increment
detx 1 0.086 0.172
dety 2 0.086 0.172
loop_
_array_structure_list.array_id
_array_structure_list.axis_set_id
_array_structure_list.dimension
_array_structure_list.direction
_array_structure_list.index
_array_structure_list.precedence
1 1 2463 increasing 1 1
1 2 2527 increasing 2 2
loop_
_diffrn_detector.id
_diffrn_detector.number_of_axes
1 2
loop_
_diffrn_detector_axis.axis_id
_diffrn_detector_axis.detector_id
detx 1
dety 1
Confirmed that the rotation direction is the opposite of the direction initially guessed above, and the beam centre is noticeably different to the exact centre of the detector. The middle image below is with reversed x axis direction, the final image is as per above.
Based on this the revised description is:
_audit.block_id Alba_XALOC
_diffrn_source.beamline XALOC
_diffrn_source.facility Alba
loop_
_axis.id
_axis.type
_axis.equipment
_axis.depends_on
_axis.vector[1]
_axis.vector[2]
_axis.vector[3]
_axis.offset[1]
_axis.offset[2]
_axis.offset[3]
angle rotation goniometer . 1 0 0 0
0 0
source . source . 0 0 1 0
0 0
gravity . gravity . 0 -1 0 0
0 0
two_theta rotation detector . 1 0 0 0
0 0
trans translation detector two_theta 0 0 -1 0
0 0
detx translation detector trans 1 0 0 -212.81800
224.12200 0
dety translation detector detx 0 -1 0 0
0 0
loop_
_array_structure_list_axis.axis_id
_array_structure_list_axis.axis_set_id
_array_structure_list_axis.displacement
_array_structure_list_axis.displacement_increment
detx 1 0.086 0.172
dety 2 0.086 0.172
loop_
_array_structure_list.array_id
_array_structure_list.axis_set_id
_array_structure_list.dimension
_array_structure_list.direction
_array_structure_list.index
_array_structure_list.precedence
1 1 2463 increasing 1 1
1 2 2527 increasing 2 2
loop_
_diffrn_detector.id
_diffrn_detector.number_of_axes
1 2
loop_
_diffrn_detector_axis.axis_id
_diffrn_detector_axis.detector_id
detx 1
dety 1
Facility name
Alba
Beamline name
XALOC
Is updated?
Start date
2015-04-19
Finish date
No response
Principal axis orientation
0
Goniometer axes
angle, a
Rotation axis name
angle
kappa
No response
Image orientation
top left
Fast direction
horizontal
Pixel size
0.172, 0.172
Number of pixels
2463, 2527
Detector axes
No response
xds.inp
No response
Data DOI
https://zenodo.org/record/820648/files/PDB_5J1G_NATIVE_diffraction_images.tgz
Comments
The only unknown for the beamline geometry is the direction of the rotation axis. The present submission is a guess in order to generate a geometry for testing. Also, the miniCBF files at the above location do not indicate the oscillation axis beyond the cryptic "X, CW" notation. The PHI axis is fixed at zero for all scans, so presumably something like omega is scanned.