Fill in SRS Document Section 2

[Kelistrah]

Grading Rubric: (Due 10/16) SRS ( /10)

Examples: [Team E 2022](https://docs.google.com/document/d/102TYJwTMRb3uJG8bkk1XLBtnxU4dJYYT/edit)  [Team F 2022](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1U4bD9EDc3W9SLv9QI0Lev2ebVLBtD7JO/edit)

Example Mockups: [Team C 2022](https://miro.com/app/board/uXjVNaxNZpA=/?share_link_id=773411667516)

Need to check if the comments from Deliverable 1 have been addressed. 

For any comment that is not addressed (every single one), deduct -2 points. 

Fill in the rest of the sections, using information from the project description document. 

    See [this example](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WkqFkOZBiUtC19x8w7Zt7qIg8MJishZp/edit?usp=sharing&ouid=108788083057609121398&rtpof=true&sd=true) for an example of the minimum level of detail required.

    Unlike this example, your section 4 should be organized into subsections, grouping by general feature area or top-level use cases (i.e. don’t have a sub section for every single use case that is an extension, or instance of)

Has about 15 – 30 functional requirements 

    If the number of FR is below 15, -10 points

Has about 10 – 15 non-functional requirements. 

    If the number of NFR is below 10, -10 points

For each wrong requirement deduct -2 points. 

For each conflicting/contradictory requirement, deduct -2 points.  

If the UI is missing deduct -10 points.

If the UI mockups are not updated significantly i.e. at least 50% more and prior ones improved, deduct -10 points. This is not only the designer's task but they should lead this.

Use cases are required in a separate document.

[Kelistrah]

Section 2 was filled out and it is ready to be quality checked.