Open TomWagg opened 8 months ago
Here's 100 more
As a test I also checked the successful binaries in the simulation (~1.5 million) and found that there were exactly zero that evolved onto HeHG (kstar_1=8) during stable mass transfer. I did find successful binaries that
So in summary it seems like COSMIC can't currently handle a star evolving into HeHG during stable mass transfer I think.
When running
COSMIC
on large populations of binaries I frequently run into edge cases that result in NaN values in thebpp
output. I've been chatting with @katiebreivik about this and realised I should probably organise a little. So here's an issue about this and I'll keep a list of commonalities that seem to result in NaNs up to date and postinitC
andbpp
tables in the comments below.NaN clues noticed so far:
RRLO_1
column is the first one that seems to get a NaNedit: GitHub won't let me upload hdf5 files so I'm going to attach separate CSVs instead!
Here's a quick confirmation that it is happening whenever you have a star evolving to HeHG during mass transfer: