@NMStiegler has been investigating issue related to the SNR calculations for seticore. We are finding inconsistencies in the values and a high number of false positives based on the threshold of 8 sigma. Here we will detail the investigation on how to fix this.
Some suggestions on a general level are:
Replace the calulcation for noise in seticore and seticore viewer.
Low Risk - modifies current calculation but doesn’t impact other functions of seticore.
2.Replace entire SNR calculation in seticore with the logic from BLISS
Medium Risk - modifies current calculation but doesn’t impact other functions of seticore.
2.5.Remove the PFB response from the spectra within seticore
Medium Risk - modifies current calculation but doesn’t impact other functions of seticore.
Replace seticore with BLISS
High Risk - seticore runs the stamp process and beamformer. So this would all require integration.
Replace the SNR threshold with one more suited to the low-N statistics of short integrations
These options are not all mutually exclusive. IMHO, removing the PFB passband should definitely be implemented in seticore (in general, not just for COSMIC).
@NMStiegler has been investigating issue related to the SNR calculations for seticore. We are finding inconsistencies in the values and a high number of false positives based on the threshold of 8 sigma. Here we will detail the investigation on how to fix this.
Some suggestions on a general level are: