Closed lb42 closed 2 years ago
Dear Lou Those cases are the ones that were digitalized for us by the National Library of Portugal. I put them as digital source because I expect they will also be put available for the general public there. But I understand now that either I get the URL from them, or it makes no sense. I've just asked them if they have made them available. Best, Diana
Lou notifications@github.com escreveu no dia domingo, 7/06/2020 à(s) 14:02:
Most
contain a supplying the URL for the digital source (79 by my count). But there remain 21 for which only text (in the ) is supplied. — You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/COST-ELTeC/ELTeC-por/issues/2, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AB6H44SSXA7MHLM2UDUYUPLRVN6WBANCNFSM4NXEWEAQ .
Most of them are indeed from the National Library; I see three which are not, though: POR0077 (Wikimedia); POR0066 (Bibliotronica); POR0008 (Project Gutenberg!)
Thank you, these have been corrected. Could you please see ig the title pages of the three are as they should? Thanks a lot in advance
Lou notifications@github.com escreveu no dia domingo, 7/06/2020 à(s) 17:40:
Most of them are indeed from the National Library; I see three which are not, though: POR0077 (Wikimedia); POR0066 (Bibliotronica); POR0008 (Project Gutenberg!)
— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/COST-ELTeC/ELTeC-por/issues/2#issuecomment-640237479, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AB6H44XHTYPMGNO74TFA65TRVOYG5ANCNFSM4NXEWEAQ .
There are still just three cases where the <ref>
does not have a valid value:
POR0006
POR0065
POR0075
The PURL is ok, but you need to prefix it with "http://purl.pt" in each case
Dear Lou, I changed the reference, hope they are ok now :) Happy New year! Diana
Lou notifications@github.com escreveu no dia domingo, 3/01/2021 à(s) 18:38:
There are still just three cases where the does not have a valid value: POR0006 POR0065 POR0075 The PURL is ok, but you need to prefix it with "http://purl.pt" in each case
— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/COST-ELTeC/ELTeC-por/issues/2#issuecomment-753651031, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AB6H44XWU22E6ZVHQNKABYLSYCTSDANCNFSM4NXEWEAQ .
All looks fine now so closing this.
Most
<bibl type='digitalSource'>
contain a<ref>
supplying the URL for the digital source (79 by my count). But there remain 21 for which only text (in the<publisher>
) is supplied.