Closed ppb2020 closed 9 months ago
I see no real problem if it is changed to int16. But then we need to update description as well - I see two options:
Feel free to create a PR.
Meeting notes:
Confirming that our sampling showing negative torque for combustion engines was indeed obtained from CAN buses by at least two of our providers, from actual vehicles.
Supports negative torque now on master, closing issue
The current definition of combustion engine torque is as follows:
It's not clear why a negative value must be ignored. There are situations where the value of negative torque would be useful in some calculations.
Could the datatype be changed to an int16 in order to support negative values? (V4 being a new major versions, it would be the right time for this kind of change.)