This is a follow up proposal to the items listed below, showing a potential solution:
Duplicating instances os we have both Left/Right and DriverSide/PassengerSide
Leaving mapping to implementation
Concerning implementation, I see several alternatives.
If an OEM exclusively use Left/Right or Driver/Passenger references, they can in overlay remove the labels they do not need, or just not provide values for the unused "dimension"
If both are used it can either be managed within the server by some config, or you have a LHD/RHD-specific mapper that manage mapping where needed.
Would a change like in this PR be an acceptable solution?
Please review/discuss, will need longer discussion if this is how we want things to be
Daniel: Instances cannot be normative, focus should be mostly on entities, feature of interest, only suggesting a set of instances. But current expanded representation is a bit problematic as it mix entity and instance.
This is a follow up proposal to the items listed below, showing a potential solution:
Concerning implementation, I see several alternatives.
Would a change like in this PR be an acceptable solution?
https://github.com/COVESA/vehicle_signal_specification/pull/695 https://github.com/COVESA/vehicle_signal_specification/discussions/639 https://github.com/COVESA/vehicle_signal_specification/issues/642