Closed xbroquer closed 3 years ago
Follow up :)
@lutzbichler Can you please clarify this particular point ? I just forked this repo to only remove the instance_id in order to get e2e profile working on my side.
The instance ID was added to avoid using the same data id for different instances of the same service. We will make this optional.
thanks , having this optional will be fine
Hello,
First of all thank you very much for implementing e2e profile 4 protection!
I have a question about e2e header generation and more precisely on data_id , for SWS_E2E_00366 req :
https://github.com/GENIVI/vsomeip/blob/13f9c89ced6ffaeb1faf485152e27e1f40d234cd/implementation/e2e_protection/src/e2e/profile/profile04/protector.cpp#L37
https://github.com/GENIVI/vsomeip/blob/13f9c89ced6ffaeb1faf485152e27e1f40d234cd/implementation/e2e_protection/include/e2e/profile/profile04/profile_04.hpp#L15
I were not able to find the Req that impose to add the instance ID in MSB of data id.
Here the document I used to check the implementation: https://www.autosar.org/fileadmin/user_upload/standards/classic/4-2/AUTOSAR_SWS_E2ELibrary.pdf
Do you have some detail why you added the instance id ?
Thanks, Xavier.