Closed lokkju closed 4 years ago
That’s interesting! We’ve been thinking about it, of course. But most people we’re talking to do not anticipate the antibody testing to be widespread that soon.
Thank you for thinking of us!
Alexis
On Mar 27, 2020, at 4:21 AM, Loki Coyote notifications@github.com wrote:
Sort of a meta-issue, but antibody testing results should start being available before too long, and I'd like to make sure the project is ready to track those results (assuming it wants to).
Specifically, adding IgG and IgM tested/positive/negative for upcoming rapid tests would be hugely useful as soon as that data starts becoming available.
If the project is already ready to handle it, it also gives an incentive to anyone who does have that data to make it available to this project, so as to get it in as many hands as possible.
While no national labs seem to be preparing to do antibody testing, at least some independent medical facilities and state labs reported already are, or will soon be.
As an example, this facility expects to have 12K test kits this week: https://www.ocregister.com/2020/03/25/garden-grove-doctor-one-of-first-in-u-s-to-offer-coronavirus-rapid-blood-test/
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
I've reached out to the Dao medical group to see if they'll be publishing their data, and I'm continuously looking for more sources, though it looks like we'll probably see international data on that before widespread US data.
San Miguel County in Colorado is publishing their results now, but it brings up another twist; They are doing "total antibody" ELISA testing, which doesn't differentiate between IgG and IgM. That said, the data is still available now, with ~900 out of 8000 planned tests completed.
Thank you, Loki. We're looking forward to seeing how these show up in state data. Right now, we aren't regularly tracking things on the county level.
Alexis
On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 4:12 PM Loki Coyote notifications@github.com wrote:
More results from Denmark: https://www.sst.dk/-/media/Udgivelser/2020/Corona/Status-og-strategi/COVID19_Status-6-uge.ashx?la=da&hash=6819E71BFEAAB5ACA55BD6161F38B75F1EB05999
— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/COVID19Tracking/issues/issues/64#issuecomment-611240631, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACS7NYI3JVVXOQY7MQOEECLRLUAGZANCNFSM4LU5ZG7Q .
-- Alexis Madrigal Staff Writer | The Atlantic Co-Founder | The Atlantic's COVID Tracking Project, covidtracking.com m. 415 602 4953
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions!
This issue has been closed because it was stale for 15 days, and there was no further activity on it for 10 days. You can feel free to re-open it if the issue is important, and label it as "not stale."
Sort of a meta-issue, but antibody testing results should start being available before too long, and I'd like to make sure the project is ready to track those results (assuming it wants to).
Specifically, adding IgG and IgM tested/positive/negative for upcoming rapid tests would be hugely useful as soon as that data starts becoming available.
If the project is already ready to handle it, it also gives an incentive to anyone who does have that data to make it available to this project, so as to get it in as many hands as possible.
While no national labs seem to be preparing to do antibody testing, at least some independent medical facilities and state labs reported already are, or will soon be.
As an example, this facility expects to have 12K test kits this week: https://www.ocregister.com/2020/03/25/garden-grove-doctor-one-of-first-in-u-s-to-offer-coronavirus-rapid-blood-test/