Open garu opened 1 year ago
Some thoughs:
good point, @stigtsp. At first I considered escalating the type of vulnerability from the third party, but "depends on vulnerable third-party component" without specifying the actual issue may be better as it points out the 3rd party library may expose users to other risks outside their perl code - not to mention it makes things much easier for reporters.
Some package managers like Rust's provide a category to their issues' metadata. I think it really helps keep things organized. A given advisory could have multiple categories, even though I believe most will fall under just one.
I'd like us to decide which advisory categories to use, if any. RustSec defines the following categories on their advisories:
For CPANSEC I would also like to consider:
What do you think?
I plan on reviewing all relevant CVEs and adding at least one category for each of them. At the end, we should have a good enough list (we can always add more later).