BUG: default-Resampling of "Number of layers"

[tinaek]

Horizon-tab:

• If "Number of Layers" are not set in first run (run 1), Crava makes its own number (302), dependent of the Correlation direction ==> OK! BUT: When rerunning the Crava (run 2) with the same "number of layers" (302) as Crava gave in the first run (run 1), the "number of layers" are being resampled ( to 318) due to correlation direction....but the surface direction has not been changed in run 2 compared to run 1. Shouldn't the "number of layers" then be kept the same in run 2 as it was "defaulted by Crava" in run 1? Ex:

---

* Setting up multiple interval grid * (taken from logfile)

---

RUN 1: Creating extended simbox with one correlation surface for interval 'zone 1'. Z padding sizes estimated from an assumed wavelet length for interval 'zone 1': zPad, zPadFac, nz, nzPad : 200ms, 0.192, 302, 360

Run 2:Creating extended simbox with one correlation surface for interval 'zone 1'. Number of layers in interval zone 1 increased from 302 to 318 because of the correlation direction. Z padding sizes estimated from an assumed wavelet length for interval 'zone 1': zPad, zPadFac, nz, nzPad : 200ms, 0.179, 318, 375

[hgolsen]

CRA-820

[alfbr]

Make clear difference between number of layers in inversion grid and visualization grid.

[hgolsen]

The logging information regarding the different grids are updated. We emphasize that the simbox used for inversion is temporary, and added more logging regarding the final visualization grid.

[alfbr]

Thanks!