Ant11234
commented
11 months ago Individual Review "Anthony" grading "Derrick"
- [x] Individual should show that they were key contributor and example to team. This includes their participation in ideas, plans, creating individual issues, providing code commits to project, crossover grading participation, being on task and positive example in the classroom. (0.9)
Individuals Video, Issue(s), Commits(s)
- [x] Video, includes Web demo of key contribution to project, 1 minute (0.9)
- [x] Issue(s) that show plans/progress to team objectives (0.8)
- [x] Highlights of key commit(s) in Issues, summarizes code contributions (0.8)
-
[x] Review GitHub analytics for key commits in each weeks during the project, shows consistent participation for 3 weeks (0.9)
Per check.
0.55 not attempted/no check 0.7 attempted, incomplete, but some runtime 0.8 mastery and runtime 0.9 above and beyond.Freeform comment.
Provide positivies and growth summary.
Justify or comment on final score.
Be sure to provide extra details on anything below 0.7 average or above 0.8.
Final Comments
Overall Score: (0.9+0.9+0.8+0.8+0.9)/5 = 0.86
Showed a lot of participation and progress with their project. Showed lots of backend work and based on commits in their profile, you can tell that they stayed on task and completed a lot for their group. Based on what I saw in the video and talking through the backend and frontend contributions he made I gave Derrick three 0.9's and two 0.8. He had his video fully completed and detailed, and he showed a lot of contribution to the project through his key commits. I also was impressed with how on task he stayed throughout the project consistently making contributions almost every day. Great job overall.
Individuals