Kaiden Do - Ticket

[kaiden-dough]

Name	Team + Indi + Teacher	Runtime	Issues	Key Commit (s)	Analytics
Kaiden	1.75333 = 0.88333 + 0.82 + 0.05	Localhost	Video	Sort Recursion	Backend

[nikhilc3]

Individual Review "Nikhil" grading "Kaiden"

• [0.9] Individual should show that they were key contributor and example to team. This includes their participation in ideas, plans, creating individual issues, providing code commits to project, crossover grading participation, being on task and positive example in the classroom.
• Obvious participation as seen by video and run time in person

Individuals Video, Issue(s), Commits(s)

• [0.8] Video, includes Web demo of key contribution to project, 1 minute
• Video is detiled and throughou and is exactly 1 minute long
• [0.8] Issue(s) that show plans/progress to team objectives
• Does show plan and progress as he worked on backen fibonacci and sorting
• [0.8] Highlights of key commit(s) in Issues, summarizes code contributions
• They are good he did a lot of work on the sorting algorithm with the API
• [0.8] Review GitHub analytics for key commits in each weeks during the project, shows consistent participation for 3 weeks

• Maybe more commits throughout instead of commiting at the end, but the commits still are evident, said his machine was broken and showed proof of working with teammates

  Per check.
  0.55 not attempted/no check 0.7 attempted, incoomplete, but some runtime 0.8 mastery and runtime 0.9 above and beyond.

  Freeform comment.
  Provide positivies and growth summary.
  Justify or comment on final score.
  Be sure to provide extra details on anything below 0.7 average or above 0.8.

The first and third check are 0.9 because as seen in the plans and team issues, he is contributing to the team with in depth plans and ideas of contributions. He contributed to the project well through backend coding of sorting and recursion for fibbonacci displaying his diverse work. This work is good but he could improve by doing more work before the due date because a lot of his work is done the day before and the day of but he does have a good share of work. Other than that, his work is pretty solid. He could also improve by doing a little more work so it is evenly split up. Final Score is 4.1/5.