Closed DjalmaPessoa closed 8 years ago
I tried to clean up your question. Please amend it if I have messed up something. Please not LaTeX code is not supported here.
hi, djalma sent you a pdf with properly-formatted latex. github isn't letting us upload it here (i have submitted a bug report to them)
hi, are the recent commits related to this issue? thanks!
we do not have an answer yet on this. We are still working on it.
hi, any chance your team might be able to take a look at this? thanks!
hi, github now allows me to upload a zipped file.. does the CSB team think it might be able to look at this discrepancy? thanks!
In vardpoor version 0.7.0 is corrected mistake in linrmir and in linarr.
To estimate the derivative of the cumulative distribution function, Osier(2009) proposes the formula:
with
h
estimated by:Considering
h
fixed and defining the variablez
:Then,
F'_{K(x)}
is the mean ofz
:An estimate of the mean of
z
in the domainC
iswhere
I_C
is the indicator of the domain.In the function
linrmir
, to estimate the derivative in the quantilequant_under
for people aged below 65 it was used:1. Linearization of the median income of people aged below 65
From this, outside the domain, the values of u1 are 0 and the correspondent values of
vec_f1
are equal to1/ \sqrt{2\pi}
, independently of the distance fromx_k
tox
.The denominator
N1
estimates the domain population and just adds the weights for observations in the domain while in the numerator, becauseexp(0)=1
, all observations take part in the sum.The estimate
\hat{F'}_K(x)
using the same notation would be:2. Linearization of the median income of people aged below 65
the same applies for the value of the derivative at
quant_over
.I wonder if
dom1
was misplaced?References:
Guillaume Osier (2009). Variance estimation for complex indicators of poverty and inequality. Journal of the European Survey Research Association, Vol.3, No.3, pp. 167-195, ISSN 1864-3361, http://ojs.ub.uni-konstanz.de/srm/article/view/369.
pessoad@gmail.com